Overview
|
Critically Endangered |
|
Description
Family Cichlidae
Cichlids
are distributed in Central and South America, Texas (1 species), West Indies, Africa, Madagascar, Syria, Israel, Iran, Sri Lanka, and coastal southern India. Some species widely introduced
.
Body shape
quite variable, mostly moderately deep and compressed
. A nostril on each side of head
. Interrupted
lateral line in most species. Scales
in lateral lines may be over 100, usually 20-50. Dorsal fin usually with 7-25 spines and 5-30 soft rays
. Spines in anal fin 3-15 (generally 3); soft rays 4-15 (a few with 30). Subocular shelf
absent. About 80 cm maximum length
, in Boulengerochromis microlepis. Colorful cichlids are reared as aquarium
fish. Breeding activities highly organized. Parental care in 3 forms: mouthbrooding, substratebrooding, and substratebrooding of eggs
then mouthbrooding of young. Species flocks
are reported from Africa.
The cichlids are the most species-rich non-Ostariophysan fish family in freshwaters
world-wide, and one of the major vertebrate families, with at least 1300 species and with estimates approaching 1900 species (Kullander, 1998). The geographical distribution includes freshwaters of Africa (900 valid
species, estimated more than 1300 species), the Jordan Valley in the Middle
East (four species), Iran (one species), southern India and Sri Lanka (3 species, also in brackish water), Madagascar (17 valid species, some also in brackish water), Cuba and Hispaniola (4 valid species, some in brackish water), North America and isthmian Central America (95 valid species), and South America (290 valid species ) (Kullander, 1998, updated).
Cichlids are known by family
or genus-level local names
, commonly with an adjective to distinguish well-marked species. Higher level names include bujurqui (Peru, most cichlids), acará (Brazil, most cichlids), mochoroca (Venezuela), mojarra (Ecuador, Colombia, throughout Central America), krobia (Surinam), prapra (French Guiana). Cichla species are known locally as pavón (Venezuela, Colombia) or tucunaré (Brazil, Peru), the latter name expressed as lukanani (Guyana), toekoenali (Surinam), toukounaré (French Guiana) or similar names in the Guianas. Crenicichla species are known as jacundá in Brazil, añashúa in Peru, angoumot (French Guiana), mataguaro (Colombia, Venezuela), datra fisi (Surinam), cabeza amarga (Argentina and Uruguay).
Cichlids are recognized by several unambiguous anatomical synapomorphies. 1. The loss of a major structural association between parts A2
and Aw of the adductor mandibulae muscle and the musculous insertion
of a large ventral
section
of A2 onto the posterior border
of the ascending process
of the anguloarticular (Stiassny, 1981); 2. The presence of an extensive cartilaginous
cap on the anterior margin
of each second epibranchial
bone (Stiassny, 1981); 3. The presence of an expanded head of each fourth epibranchial bone (Stiassny, 1981); 4. The presence of characteristically shaped and distributed micro-branchiospines on the gill
arches (Stiassny, 1981); 5. The transversus dorsalis anterior muscle is subdivided into four distinct
parts (Liem & Greenwood). 6. The stomach has an extendible blind pouch (Zihler, 1982) 7. The stomach has a left hand exit to the anterior intestine and the first intestinal loop is on the left side (Zihler, 1982) 8. The sagitta features an anterocaudal pseudocolliculum having a long and thick ventral part which is separated from the crista
inferior by a long, deep and sharp furrow (Gaemers, 1985). 9. Short paired
hypapophyses on the third and/or fourth vertebral centra
(Kullander, 1998).
Cichlid diversity
has been explained both by their advanced
brood care and by the versatile design of the pharyngeal jaw
complex
used for food mastication. The unpaired lower pharyngeal
toothplate and the opposed upper pharyngeal tooth plates
are contained in a muscular sling characterizing labroid fishes
. There is considerable variation
in the shape and of the toothplates and associated dentition, reflecting diet
specializations. The oral jaws
are generally highly movable and protrusible
, and tooth
shape varies greatly, although most Neotropical
cichlids have simple
, subconical, unicuspid
teeth, whereas African cichlids commonly have laterally bicuspid
or tricuspid
oral
teeth.
Among Neotropical fishes they can be recognized externally by the possession of 7-24 (usually 13-16) spines in the dorsal fin, 2-12 (usually 3, rarely more than 5) anal-fin spines; and a single nostril on each side of the head. The lateral line is usually divided
into one anterior upper portion ending below the end of the dorsal-fin base
, and a posterior lower portion running along the middle of the caudal peduncle. Among Neotropical taxa, lengths range
from about 25-30 mm adult
size in Apistogramma and Taeniacara, to about 1 meter in Cichla temensis. Most taxa are in the interval 10-20 cm, however. Most Neotropical cichlids occupy lentic
habitats
within rivers
and streams
; but there is also a number of moderately to strongly adapted rheophilic
species. The latter include many Crenicichla species and the genera Teleocichla and Retroculus, which are distributed mainly in the Brazilian and Guianan highlands.
The majority of the Neotropical cichlids feed
on a variety of invertebrates
and some plant matter, and specializations among those species remain little investigated. Cichla, large Crenicichla species, Petenia, Parachromis, Caquetaia, Astronotus, and Acaronia, feed on fishes and large invertebrates. Chaetobranchopsis, Chaetobranchus and Satanoperca acuticeps are plankton feeders
. Most Neotropical Cichlidae are moderately to strongly sex dimorphic
, and breed
pairwise. Eggs are typically deposited on a substrate and both parents guard offspring over several weeks, even for some time after the young are free-swimming
. Smaller species, particularly in the genus Apistogramma, may be strongly sexually dimorphic. Sexes differ in color and the female is smaller than the male and assumes all or most of the care for the eggs and young. Oral incubation, or mouthbrooding, has been recorded for many Geophagus, Gymnogeophagus, and Satanoperca species, but also for one species of Aequidens and one species of Heros. Mouthbrooding species are usually biparental
, and eggs are guarded on a substrate prior to oral incubation which starts with advanced eggs or newly hatched larvae. A few mouthbrooding species practice exclusive maternal brood care, with a minimum delay between egg-laying
and oral incubation (Gymnogeophagus balzanii, NE Colombian Geophagus species).
Geographical ranges are commonly limited to a single river or even one or a few streams, reflecting both ecological constraints and drainage basin histories. A few Neotropical cichlids are recorded from brackish water conditions. The northernmost species are Herichthys cyanoguttatus from the lower Rio Grande drainage
in Texas, USA, on the Atlantic coast, and ‘Cichlasoma beani’, which reaches
north to the Río Yaquí on the Pacific coast of Mexico. In South America cichlids are recorded from virtually all river drainages, but rarely occupy elevations
over 500 m
ASL, and generally remain below 200 m ASL. Cichlids are absent from the Río Marañón above the Pongo de Manseriche and from the Río Ucayali drainage upstream of Atalaya (the mouth
of the Río Urubamba [Río Vilcanota] and Río Tombo [Río Apurimac]). There are four permanent cichlid species occurring on the island of Trinidad, but no cichlids are found on any other islands close to the Venezuelan coast. Most Atlantic coastal rivers of Brazil have 1-3 species of cichlids. The southern limit
of the family in South America is not well documented, but may be in the lower Río Negro in Argentina, which river marks the northern limit of Patagonia. On the Pacific slope
, cichlids are found in a succession
of permanent rivers south to the Río Jequetepeque or perhaps even to slightly south of Lima, Peru.
Because of the varied behavior and often attractive colors and moderate size, cichlids are commonly kept as ornamental
fish. Practically all genera and more than half of the species have been kept in aquaria
at some time. The traditionally most important aquarium species are Pterophyllum and Symphysodon species, the former often representing the aquarium hobby in logotypes
.
Sportfishing is concentrated on the Cichla species for which there is a strong
North American and Brazilian market including sport fishing
safaris and Tucunaré fishing
contests predominantly in Brazil (Kelber, 1999). All the larger species are used as food fish
, within a traditional artisanal and subsistence fishery
, and all local markets in the lowland Amazon and Orinoco drainages offer
Cichla, Astronotus, and other available species of sizes over 10 cm (Ferreira et al.
, 1998, for a market survey at Santarém). Astronotus species, and to some extent Cichla species are subject to aquaculture in Brazil.
The family Cichlidae was first monographed by Heckel (1840), based on the Natterer collection
from Brazil (illustrations in Riedl-Dorn, 2000). Another early major treatise is by Jardine (1843), based on the Schomburgk collection from Guyana, Brazil and Venezuela (Kullander & Stawikowski, 1997a-b, for identifications
). Steindachner (1875) worked on the Thayer expedition
collection of Amazonian cichlids, but did not add much beyond the work of Heckel. Günther (1868, based on several shorter papers) described and illustrated a large part of the Central American cichlid fauna
, followed by Regan (1906-1908). Pellegrin (1904) revised the family with diagnoses of all genera and species known to him. Much of Pellegrin’s efforts
with the Neotropical taxa were improved upon by Regan’s series of generic
revisions
in the next two years (Regan, 1905-1906), which remained the platform for all Neotropical cichlid systematics
until the 1980s. The first modern phylogenetic
revision of the Neotropical cichlids was presented by Cichocki (1976), and most recently Kullander (1988) and Farias et al. (1999) have provided phylogenetic hypotheses based on morphology and molecular data
respectively. A formal classification down
to tribe
is provided by Kullander (1988). Scientific general reviews of the family are provided by Keenleyside (1991) and Barlow (2000). There is no scientific monograph
covering all Neotropical cichlid species, but numerous
aquarium books of variable quality, of which Stawikowski & Werner (1998) may be consulted for the most updated compilation of cichlasomine cichlids. Country monographs of cichlids are available for Peru (Kullander, 1986) and Surinam (Kullander & Nijssen, 1989). Bussing (1998: 293-384) summarizes data on 24 Costa
Rican cichlid species; Keith et al. (2000: 146-229) summarize data for 38 cichlid species from French Guiana and adjacent
countries; Greenfield & Thomerson (1997:184-206) cover
19 species from Belize Recent generic revisions cover Crenicichla (Ploeg, 1991; innumerable errors
and inconsistencies), Gymnogeophagus (Reis & Malabarba, 1988), Apistogramma (Kullander, 1980, somewhat outdated), Cichlasoma (Kullander, 1983), Teleocichla (Kullander, 1988), Retroculus (Gosse, 1971), Geophagus s. lato (Gosse, 1976, somewhat outdated), Biotoecus (Kullander, 1989), and Mesonauta (Kullander & Silfvergrip, 1991). Kullander (1998) estimated that there are about ten undescribed North-Central American cichlid taxa and about 160 undescribed South American taxa.
Numerous problems of species discrimination remain. Some of the most enigmatic cases includes ‘Cichlasoma’ urophthalmus, of which Hubbs (1936) described numerous subspecies. Some of these taxa are certainly distinct species, but the status of highly localized subspecies
from the Yucatán peninsula, which are based on one or very few specimens, remains a subject for revision.
Another source of frustration concerns the generic assignment of Central American taxa, and a few South American taxa, which were excluded
from the catch-all
genus Cichlasoma by Kullander (1983). Most of these are now recognized in well-diagnosed genera (Kullander, 1986, 1996, Kullander & Hartel, 1997), but several are kept with the generic denomination ‘Cichlasoma’ which is judged better than to include them in genera to which they certainly do not belong. On the whole it is not satisfactory to have one-third of the Neotropical cichlid fauna without a generic name
, illustrating a real problem with the more formalized procedure of naming species, but it could also signify a safeguarding against doubtful species. The current
estimate of 450 South American taxa is based on species already represented in museum collections; it can be assumed that new collections will bring in many more new taxa.The family Cichlidae belongs to the Class
Actinopterygii
(ray-finned fishes) and the Order
Perciformes. It contains 105 genera and 1300 species. It may be found in Brackish
, and Freshwater environments and is primarily Secondary freshwater. Many members
of this family are used in the aquarium trade. Reproductively, most members of this family are bearers and guarders
. The main mode
of swimming of adult fish in this family is carangiform
. Compared with other fish, the activity level of this family tends to be normal. Members of this family have been dated back to the Eocene epoch of the Tertiary period. This family may be found from 37° n to 35° s and 110° w to 84° e. Etymology
of this family name
: Greek, kichle = a kind of fish.
Taxonomy
- Domain:
Eukaryota
(
)
- Whittaker & Margulis,1978
- Kingdom:
Animalia
(
)
- Linnaeus, 1758
- animals
- Subkingdom:
Bilateria
(
)
- (Hatschek, 1888) Cavalier-Smith, 1983
- Branch:
Deuterostomia
(
)
- Grobben, 1908
- Infrakingdom:
Chordonia
(
)
- (Haeckel, 1874) Cavalier-Smith, 1998
- Phylum:
Chordata
(
)
- Bateson, 1885
- Chordates
- Subphylum:
Vertebrata
(
)
- Cuvier, 1812
- Vertebrates
- Infraphylum:
Gnathostomata
(
)
- Auct.
- Jawed Vertebrates
- Superclass:
Osteichthyes
(
)
- Huxley, 1880
- Bony Fishes
- Class:
Actinopterygii
(
)
- Huxley, 1880
- Ray-Finned Fishes
- Subclass:
Actinopterygii
(
)
- Ray-Finned Fishes
- Infraclass:
Actinopteri
(
)
- Cohort:
Clupeocephala
(
)
- Superorder:
Acanthopterygii
(
)
- Order:
Perciformes
(
)
-
- Suborder:
Labroidei
(
)
- Family:
Cichlidae
(
)
- Cichlids
- Genus:
Lipochromis
(
)
- Specific name:
melanopterus
- Subspecies:
complex
- Scientific name: - Lipochromis melanopterus complex
- Subspecies:
complex
- Specific name:
melanopterus
- Genus:
Lipochromis
(
- Family:
Cichlidae
(
- Suborder:
Labroidei
(
- Order:
Perciformes
(
- Superorder:
Acanthopterygii
(
- Cohort:
Clupeocephala
(
- Infraclass:
Actinopteri
(
- Subclass:
Actinopterygii
(
- Class:
Actinopterygii
(
- Superclass:
Osteichthyes
(
- Infraphylum:
Gnathostomata
(
- Subphylum:
Vertebrata
(
- Phylum:
Chordata
(
- Infrakingdom:
Chordonia
(
- Branch:
Deuterostomia
(
- Subkingdom:
Bilateria
(
- Kingdom:
Animalia
(
Similar Species
Members of the genus Lipochromis
There are approximately 23 species in this genus:
L. acuticeps · L. backflash · L. cryptodon · L. cryptodon-like · L. flashback · L. kyoga-A · L. maxillans-like · L. maxillaris · L. melanopterus complex · L. microdonlike · L. obesus · L. obesus-like · L. parvidens · L. parvidens-like · L. parvidenslike · L. parvidoid · L. pseudobesoid · L. small-obesoid · L. smallobesoid · L. sp. nov. 'backflash cryptodon' · L. sp. nov. 'black cryptodon' · L. sp. nov. 'parvidens-like' · L. sp. nov. 'small obesoid'
More Info
- Search for Pictures: images.google.com
- Search for Scholarly Articles: Google Scholar
- Search using Scientific Name and Vernacular Names: All the Web | AltaVista Canada | AltaVista | Excite | Google | HotBot | Lycos
- Search using Specialized Databases: GenBank | Medline | Scirus | CISTI/CAL | Agricola Periodicals | Agricola Books
Notes
Contributors
- Kaufman, L. 1996. Lipochromis melanopterus ssp. complex. In: IUCN 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 20 October 2006.
Identifiers
- Biodiversity Heritage Library NamebankID: 7163843
- Zipcode Zoo Species Identifier: 1018892
