Overview
|
Threatened |
|
Interesting Facts
- Amaranthus pumilus is a globally and federally threatened species (Global Heritage Status Rank G2; National Heritage Status Rank N2) originally restricted to dunes and barrier island beaches along the Atlantic Ocean from southern Massachusetts to South Carolina. It has been eliminated from two-thirds of its former range , being last reported from Massachusetts in 1849, from Rhode Island in 1856, from New Jersey in 1913, and from Virginia in 1972 (S. Ramsey et al. 2000). As of fall 2003, extant populations are known only from Long Island, New York, Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, and South Carolia. Many threats exist, including construction of sea walls and dune fencing, development, heavy recreational use, and off-road vehicle traffic. It is difficult to afford protection because of the dynamic nature of the habitat and the fugitive nature of the biology of the species. "Fugitive" refers to the fact that the species does not necessarily occur throughout its potential range at any given time (S. E. Clemants 1992). [source]
- Amaranthus pumilus is in the Center for Plant Conservations National Collection of Endangered Plants . [source]
Common Names
Common Names in English:
Coast Amaranth, Seabeach Amaranth, Seabeach Amaranthus, Seabeach Pigweed, Seaside Amaranth
Description
Family Amaranthaceae
Herbs, clambering
subshrubs
, shrubs
, or lianas. Leaves alternate or opposite, entire, exstipulate
. Flowers small, bisexual
or unisexual
, or sterile
and reduced, subtended by 1 membranous bract and 2 bracteoles, solitary or aggregated in cymes. Inflorescences elongated or condensed spikes (heads
), racemes
, or thyrsoid
structures of varying complexity. Bracteoles membranous or scarious
. Tepals 3-5, membranous, scarious or subleathery, 1-, 3-, 5-, or 7(-23) -veined. Stamens as many as tepals and opposite these, rarely fewer than tepals; filaments
free
, united
into a cup
at base
or ± entirely into a tube
, filament lobes present or absent, pseudostaminodes present or absent; anthers
(1- or) 2-loculed, dorsifixed
, introrsely dehiscent
. Ovary superior, 1-loculed; ovules 1 to many; style persistent
, short and indistinct or long and slender; stigma capitate, penicillate
, 2-lobed or forming 2 filiform
branches. Fruit a dry utricle or a fleshy
capsule, indehiscent, irregularly bursting, or circumscissile. Seeds lenticular
, reniform
, subglobose, or shortly cylindric
, smooth
or verruculose
.
About 70 genera and 900 species: worldwide; 15 genera (one introduced
) and 44 species (three endemic, 14 introduced) in China.
Morphology of the androecium, perianth (tepals), and the inflorescence has traditionally been used to circumscribe genera and tribes
. Pseudostaminodia are interstaminal appendages
with variously shaped apices. Filament appendages are the lateral
appendages of filaments (one on each side) . The basic structure of the inflorescence is the cyme (branchlets
arising from the bracteole axils, the bracteoles serving as bracts for upper flowers), which can be reduced to one flower with two bracteoles and a bract. Units
of dispersal
vary considerably (capsules opening with lower part persistent, flower and bracteoles falling together, or cymose
partial inflorescences breaking off above bract) and can be characteristic for genera. Several genera possess long trichomes
serving dispersal at the base of the tepals.[1]
Genus Amaranthus
Herbs, usually annual
, rarely perennial
, monoecious (subg. Amaranthus and Albersia) or dioecious (subg. Acnida), glabrous
or pubescent
. Stems erect
, ascending
, decumbent
, or prostrate
, usually branched, occasionally simple
or nearly so; without nodal
spines (except in A. spinosus ). Leaves alternate, petiolate
; blade
rhombic-ovate, ovate
, obovate
, spatulate
, lanceolate, oblanceolate
, or orbiculate to linear
, base
rounded
to narrowly cuneate, margins
usually entire, usually plane
, slightly undulate
, or crispate
, rarely undulate-erose, apex acute, obtuse
, or emarginate
, usually mucronulate
. Inflorescences terminal
and/or axillary
or exclusively terminal, compound
dichasia arranged in spikes, thyrses
, panicles, or glomerules
; components
of terminal inflorescences often subtended by reduced leaves (pseudobracts), each dichasium unit
subtended by persistent
bracts. Bracts ovate, lanceolate, linear, subulate
, deltate, or broadly triangular (in A. acanthochiton), or proximal
bracts modified into spines (in A. spinosus) ; bracts of pistillate
flowers not keeled
(keeled in A. scleropoides and A. crassipes) ; bracteoles absent or 1-2. Flowers unisexual
. Pistillate flowers: tepals absent or (1-) 3-5, distinct
(connate
in proximal 1/3 in A. polygonoides, equal or outer tepals larger than inner ones, usually membranaceous
, sometimes scarious
at maturity; stamens absent [rudimentary
]; pistil 1; ovule 1; style 0.1-1 mm, or absent; stigmas 2-3(-5), slender. Staminate flowers
: tepals 3-5, equal or subequal
; stamens 3-5, filaments
distinct, anthers
4-locular, pseudostaminodes absent; pistils absent or rudimentary. Utricles loosely enclosed by inner tepals, occasionally conspicuously 3(-5) -veined, usually globose
, ovoid
, or elongate-ovoid, thin walled, membranaceous, rugose
or tuberculate
, glabrous, dehiscence regularly circumscissile, irregularly dehiscent
, or indehiscent. Seeds 1, subglobose or lenticular
, usually smooth
, shiny, sometimes indistinctly puncticulate
or reticulate
; embryo annular
. x = 16, 17.
Species ca.
70 (38 in the flora
, including cultivated species) : mostly tropical
, subtropical
, and warm-temperate zones, some species in temperate
zones; some taxa are at present almost worldwide as introduced
and naturalized
weeds
.
Some segregate
genera of Amaranthus, in the broad sense, have been proposed and sometimes recognized (see synonymy
). In the present treatment, Amaranthus is accepted in its broad sense. Three subgenera
are currently recognized (S. L. Mosyakin and K
. R. Robertson 1996) : subg. Acnida, subg. Amaranthus, and subg. Albersia.
Morphologic terminology in Amaranthus, as used in different floristic and taxonomic
treatments, is rather confusing, especially regarding the terms
applied to inflorescences and flowers. In the present treatment, we follow the traditional inflorescence terminology only for brevity and convenience; see T. A. Fedorova (1997) for a more complex
scheme. A flower is subtended by a bract, often termed a "bracteole," and 0-2 lateral
bracts, the true bracteoles. Structures that are clearly reduced green leaves subtending
portions of the inflorescence are sometimes incorrectly called bracts.
Specimens of Amaranthus are often difficult to identify by someone not familiar with the group. When using the key
, look closely at the tips
of pistillate inflorescence branches for staminate flowers to determine whether the plant is monoecious or dioecious; this is especially important for some monoecious species that produce
few staminate flowers. Also, pistillate plants of dioecious species are usually required for positive
identification. Descriptions
and measurements
of floral
parts are given in more detail for pistillate flowers, unless noted otherwise.
Determining the exact distribution of some species of Amaranthus in North America requires additional floristic and taxonomic studies. Because of the weedy life strategies of some Amaranthus species, they may occasionally occur as naturalized weeds or waifs
very far from their original areas of distribution. Some of such isolated populations exist only as long as conditions are favorable and may eventually disappear or, vice versa, become expansive and invasive. These factors
, together with frequent misidentifications
in herbaria and the literature, obscure
the distribution patterns of some Amaranthus species in North America. Weedy and introduced species
of Amaranthus are often neglected or misidentified by collectors
. Consequently, some taxa are known only from scattered
localities in various regions of the flora, and their actual distribution may be much wider than present data indicate. Some species have been reported for the flora only as rare, casual
, non-naturalized aliens
, e.g.
, on ballast
, or as grain immigrants or wool contaminants, and may not now be present in North America. Because of all these factors, the maps and distribution statements in the treatment show the generalized distribution and may not properly reflect the actual changing distribution patterns of some species, especially those that have expanded their ranges
over the decades due to various anthropic factors. In addition to the taxa discussed below, some other South American or Old World species may be found in North America in the future as introduced weeds.
Species of Amaranthus occasionally form interspecific
hybrids. Such hybridization seems to be especially important and widespread in cultivated grain-amaranths, in wild representatives of the A. hybridus aggregate, between species of sect. Amaranthus, and between A. tuberculatus and species of sect. Amaranthus. The degree
and scope
of hybridization in Amaranthus are often overestimated, especially by European authors
, and some taxa described as putative hybrids are in fact nonhybrid infraspecific
forms of morphologically variable species. Hybrids between more distantly related species, if they occur at all, are usually highly sterile
, such as hybrids between taxa of the subgenera Amaranthus and Acnida, or at least show much decreased fertility
. There are no verified records
of hybrids between representatives of the subgenera Amaranthus and Albersia.
Some species of Amaranthus are cultivated as pseudocereal and leaf-vegetable crops
, or as ornamental
or fodder
plants
(J. D. Sauer 1967; D. M.
Brenner 1990; J. T. Williams and D. M. Brenner 1995; S. Cheatham et al.
1995). The most commonly cultivated taxa are A. caudatus Linnaeus, A. hypochondriacus Linnaeus, and A. cruentus Linnaeus of American origin
, and south Asian A. tricolor Linnaeus. The cultivated species may occur occasionally as escapes
near places of cultivation; they cannot be regarded as truly naturalized.
Species of Amaranthus were widely used by prehistoric and modern Native
Americans as food, forage
for livestock, medicinal plants, and, occasionally, for some other uses, such as face
and body paint, ceremonial items, and fuel (S. Cheatham et al. 1995; D. E. Moerman 1998).[2]
Physical Description
Species Amaranthus pumilus
Plants annual , glabrous . Stems prostrate to ascending (often forming mats), red, much-branched, 0.1-0.4(-0.5) m , fleshy . Leaves clustered near tips of branches; petiole 5-10 mm; blade orbiculate, broadly ovate or obovate , 1-1.5 cm × 1-1.5 cm, fleshy, base broadly cuneate to tapering, margin entire, plane or slightly undulate , apex broadly rounded to obtuse , mucronate . Inflorescences dense axillary glomerules , green. Bracts of pistillate flowers ovate or elliptic , 1.2-2 mm, 1/2 as long as tepals. Pistillate flowers: tepals 5, linear to narrowly oblanceolate , slightly unequal, 2.5-4 mm, margins entire, apex obtuse; style branches erect ; stigmas 3. Staminate flowers intermixed with pistillate; tepals 5; stamens 5. Utricles ovoid , 4-6 mm, exceeding tepals, fleshy, smooth or slightly rugose , longitudinally wrinkled on drying, indehiscent. Seeds dark reddish brown, lenticular , 2.5 mm diam., glossy. Flowering summer-fall. [source]
Habit: Forb/herb
Habitat
Maritime sand dunes, beaches, mostly on foredunes and at high tide
level; of conservation
concern; 0-10 m
[3].
Typically found in the intertidal zone at the water's edge at a mean distance from sea level of 3 meters (8 feet).[4]
Biology
Reproduction
Duration: Annual
Taxonomy
- Domain:
Eukaryota
(
)
- Whittaker & Margulis,1978
- eukaryotes
- Kingdom:
Plantae
(
)
- Haeckel, 1866
- Plants
- Subkingdom:
Viridaeplantae
(
)
- Cavalier-Smith, 1981
- Phylum:
Tracheophyta
(
)
- Sinnott, 1935 Ex Cavalier-Smith, 1998
- Vascular Plants
- Subphylum:
Euphyllophytina
(
)
- Infraphylum:
Radiatopses
(
)
- Kenrick & Crane, 1997
- Class:
Magnoliopsida
(
)
- Brongniart, 1843
- Dicotyledons
- Subclass:
Caryophyllidae
(
)
- Takhtajan, 1967
- Superorder:
Caryophyllanae
(
)
- Takhtajan, 1967
- Order:
Caryophyllales
(
)
- Perleb, 1826
- Suborder:
Chenopodiineae
(
)
- Family:
Amaranthaceae
(
)
- Adans., 1763, Nom. Cons.
- Amaranth Family
- Subfamily:
Amaranthoideae
(
)
- Tribe:
Amarantheae
(
)
- Genus:
Amaranthus
(
)
- Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 2: 989. 1753; Gen. Pl., ed. 5, 427. 1754.
- Amaranth, pigweed [Greek amarantos, unfading, nonwithering]
- Specific epithet:
pumilus
- Raf.
- Botanical name: - Amaranthus pumilus
- Specific epithet:
pumilus
- Raf.
- Genus:
Amaranthus
(
- Tribe:
Amarantheae
(
- Subfamily:
Amaranthoideae
(
- Family:
Amaranthaceae
(
- Suborder:
Chenopodiineae
(
- Order:
Caryophyllales
(
- Superorder:
Caryophyllanae
(
- Subclass:
Caryophyllidae
(
- Class:
Magnoliopsida
(
- Infraphylum:
Radiatopses
(
- Subphylum:
Euphyllophytina
(
- Phylum:
Tracheophyta
(
- Subkingdom:
Viridaeplantae
(
- Kingdom:
Plantae
(
Notes
Publishing author
: Rchb.f. Publication
: in Flora
l. 117 1867 Name
Status: Accepted Name
. Latest taxonomic
scrutiny: 15-Mar-2000
Place of publication: Med. Repos. ser. 2, 5:360. 1808
Name verified on 03-Nov-1989 by ARS Systematic Botanists. Last updated: 27-May-2004
Similar Species
Members of the genus Amaranthus
ZipcodeZoo has pages for 402 species, subspecies, varieties, forms, and cultivars in this genus. Here are just 100 of them:
A. abyssinicus · A. acanthobracteatus · A. acanthochiton (Green-Stripe Amaranth) · A. acroglochin · A. acutilobus (Sharplobe Amaranth) · A. adscendens · A. adulterinus · A. aeneus · A. aeruoides · A. affinis · A. albiflorus · A. albomarginatus · A. albus (Tumbleweed Amaranth) · A. alius · A. alopecurus · A. altissimus · A. A. caudatus (Love-Lies-Bleeding) · A. ambigens · A. amboinicus · A. anacardana · A. anardana · A. anderssoni · A. anderssonii · A. angustifolius · A. annectens · A. aragonensis · A. arardhanus · A. arctioideus · A. arenicola (Sandhills Amaranth) · A. artineanus · A. ascendens · A. ascendens subsp. polygonoides · A. asplundii · A. asplundii var. australis · A. ataco · A. atropurpureus · A. aureus · A. australis (Southern Water-Hemp) · A. bahiensis · A. batalleri · A. bellardi · A. berchtholdi · A. bernhardi · A. bicolor · A. bigelovii (Bigelow's Amaranth) · A. blitoides (Prostrate Amaranth) · A. blitum (Guernsey Pigweed) · A. blitum blitum (Purple Amaranth) · A. blitum emarginatus · A. blitum subsp. emarginatus · A. blitum subsp. oleraceus · A. blitum var. emarginatus · A. blitum var. graecizans · A. blitum var. nanus · A. blitum var. pseudogracilis (Amaranthus Blitum) · A. blitus · A. bouchoni · A. bouchonii · A. bracteosus · A. brandegei · A. brasiliensis · A. brisbanii · A. brownii (Brown's Amaranth) · A. buchtienianus · A. bullatus · A. californicus (Californian Amaranth) · A. campestris · A. canariensis · A. cannabinus (Tidal-Marsh Water-Hemp) · A. capensis · A. capensis subsp. uncinatus · A. capitatus · A. caracam · A. caracasanus · A. caracu · A. cararia · A. cararu · A. cardenasianus · A. carneus · A. carolinae · A. cathecu · A. caturus · A. caudadtus · A. caudatus (Love-Lies-Bleeding) · A. caudatus 'Atropurpurea' · A. caudatus caudatus (Love-Lies-Bleeding) · A. caudatus caudatus 'Atropurpureus' · A. caudatus 'Coral Fountain' · A. caudatus 'Dreadlocks' · A. caudatus 'Emerald Tassels' · A. caudatus 'Fat Spike' (Love-Lies-Bleeding) · A. caudatus 'Green Cascade' · A. caudatus 'Green Feathers' · A. caudatus 'Green Necklace' · A. caudatus 'Pony Tails' (Love-Lies-Bleeding) · A. caudatus subsp. saueri · A. caudatus 'Viridis' (Green Tassel Flower) · A. celosioides · A. cernuus · A. chihuahensis
More Info
- Search for Pictures: images.google.com
- Search for Scholarly Articles: Google Scholar
- Search using Scientific Name and Vernacular Names: All the Web | AltaVista Canada | AltaVista | Excite | Google | HotBot | Lycos
- Search using Specialized Databases: GenBank | Medline | Scirus | CISTI/CAL | Agricola Periodicals | Agricola Books
Further Reading
- Amaranthus pumilis Raf. (seabeach amaranth, Amaranthaceae) rediscovered in Sussex County, Delaware. 2002. McAvoy, W. A. Bartonia 61:147–148.
- An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British possessions: from Newfoundland to the parallel of the southern boundary of Virginia, and from the Atlantic Ocean westward to the 102d meridian / by Nathaniel Lord Britton and Hon. New York: C. Scribner's sons, 1913. ENG url p. 5.
- Annotated list of the ferns and flowering plants of New York state, by Homer D. House. Albany, The University of the state of New York, 1924. ENG url p. 302.
- Baskin, Jerry M.; Baskin, Carol C. 1998. Scientific Note: Seed Dormancy and Germination in the Rare Plant Species Amaranthus pumilus. Castanea. 63, 4: 493.
- Brown, R. G. & M. L. Brown. 1984. Herbaceous plants of Maryland. (HPl Mary)
- Brown, R. G.; Brown, M. L. 1984. Herbaceous plants of Maryland.
- FNA Editorial Committee. 1993–. Flora of North America. (F NAmer)
- Flora of Delaware and the Eastern Shore: an annotated list of the ferns and flowering plants of the peninsula of Delaware, Maryland and Virginia. [Wilmington]: Society of Natural History of Delaware, 1946. ENG url p. 112.
- Flora of Pennsylvania. Edited with the addition of analytical keys by John Kunkel Small. Boston, Ginn & Co., 1903. ENG url p. 122, p. 123.
- Flora of the southeastern United States; being descriptions of the seed-plants, ferns and fern-allies growing naturally in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, and in Oklahom by John Kunke New York, The author, 1913. ENG url p. 393.
- Gleason, H. A. & A. Cronquist. 1963. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. (Glea Cron)
- Gray, Asa; Fernald, Merritt Lyndon. 1987. Gray's manual of botany: a handbook of the flowering plants and ferns of the central and northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Portland, Or.: Dioscorides Press. 1632p.
- Handbook of the flora of Philadelphia and vicinity, containing data relating to the plants within the following radius: eastern Pennsylvania; all of New Jersey except the northern counties; and New Castle County, Delaware, with keys for identification co Philadelphia, Philadelphia Botanical Club, 1905. ENG url p. 136.
- Kartesz, J. T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. (L US Can ed2)
- Lea, Chris. 1999. Return of a Rare Species. Marilandica The Maryland Native Plant Society Quarterly. 7, 3: 8.
- McMahan, L.R. 1988. CPC 1987--A Successful Collecting Year. The Center for Plant Conservation. 3, 2: Cover.
- Oldfield, Margery L. 1984. The Genetic Improvement of Amaranth. The Value of Conserving Genetic Resources. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Washington, D.C. p 51-53.
- Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History. Boston [etc.]Boston Society of Natural History. ENG url p. 93.
- Radford, A. E. et al. 1964. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. (F Carolin)
- Randall, J. 2002. Bringing Back a Fugitive. Endangered Species Bulletin. 27, 3: 16-17.
- Small, J.K. 1933. Manual of the southeastern flora. New York, NY: Hafner Publishing Company. 1505p.
- The plants of Southern New Jersey; with especial reference to the flora of the Pine Barrens and the geographic distribution of the species. Trenton, 1911. ENG url p. 386.
- The plants of southern New Jersey; with especial reference to the flora of the pine barrens and the geographic distribution of the species. Trenton, 1911. ENG url p. 433.
- USFWS. 1993. Amaranthus pumilus (seabeach amaranth) determined to be threatened: Final rule. Federal Register. 58, 65: 18035-18042.
- USFWS. 1996. Recovery Plan for Seabeach Amaranth (Amaranthus pumilius Rafinesque). Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. p.59.
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Species Information: threatened and endangered animals and plants - on-line resource. (US Fish & Wildl List)
- Weakley, A.; Bucher, M. 1991. Status survey of seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus Rafinesque) in North and South Carolina, second edition (after Hurricane Hugo). Raleigh and Asheville, North Carolina: North Carolina Plant Conservation Program, North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Endangered Species Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. p.149.
- Kuan Ke-chien. 1979. Amaranthaceae. In: Kung Hsien-wu & Tsien Cho-po, eds., Fl. Reipubl. Popularis Sin. 25(2): 194241.
- Brenner, D. M. et al. 2000. Genetic resources and breeding of Amaranthus. Pl. Breed. Rev. 19: 227-285.
- Costea, M. and D. A. DeMason. 2001. Stem morphology and anatomy in Amaranthus L. (Amaranthaceae): Taxonomic significance. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 128: 254-281.
- Costea, M., A. Sanders, and G. Waines. 2001. Preliminary results toward a revision of the Amaranthus hybridus species complex (Amaranthaceae). Sida 19: 931-974.
- Mosyakin, S. L. and K. R. Robertson. 1996. New infrageneric taxa and combinations in Amaranthus L. (Amaranthaceae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 33: 275-281.
- Sauer, J. D. 1955. Revision of the dioecious amaranths. Madroño 13: 5-46.
- Sauer, J. D. 1967b. The grain amaranths and their relatives: A revised taxonomic and geographic survey. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 54: 103-137.
- Sauer, J. D. 1972b. The dioecious amaranths: A new species name and major range extensions. Madroño 21: 426-434.
- Uline, E. B. and W. L. Bray. 1894. A preliminary synopsis of the North American species of Amaranthus. Bot. Gaz. 19: 267-273, 313-320.
Notes
Contributors
- "Amaranthus pumilus". in Flora of North America Vol. 4 Page 414, 428, 430. Published by Oxford University Press. Online at EFloras.org.
- Bisby, F.A., Y.R. Roskov, M.A. Ruggiero, T.M. Orrell, L.E. Paglinawan, P.W. Brewer, N. Bailly, J. van Hertum, eds (2007). Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2007 Annual Checklist. Species 2000: Reading, U.K.
- Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Accessed December 11, 2007. http://www.gbif.org Mediated distribution data from 2 providers.
- The International Plant Names Index. Accessed Jan 19, 2007.
- USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. Germplasm Resources Information Network - (GRIN) [Online Database]. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. URL (April 25, 2008)
Data Sources
Accessed through GBIF Data Portal December 11, 2007:
- USDA PLANTS, USDA PLANTS Database
Identifiers
- Biodiversity Heritage Library NamebankID: 2646911
- Catalogue of Life Accepted Name Code: ITS-20744
- Global Biodiversity Information Facility Taxonkey: 13740642
- Globally Unique Identifier: urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:59642-1
- GRIN Nomen Number: 315346
- Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) Taxonomic Serial Number (TSN): 20744
- International Plant Names Index (IPNI) ID: 327381-2
- Natural Heritage Network Species Identifier: PDAMA040Z0
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species Identifier: Q2MZ
- U.S.D.A. Plant Symbol: AMPU2
- Zipcode Zoo Species Identifier: 19692
Footnotes
- Bojian Bao, Thomas Borsch & Steven E. Clemants "Amaranthaceae". in Flora of China Vol. 5 Page 415. Published by Science Press (Beijing) and Missouri Botanical Garden Press. Online at EFloras.org. [back]
- Sergei L. Mosyakin & Kenneth R. Robertson "Amaranthus". in Flora of North America Vol. 4 Page 405, 406, 410. Oxford University Press. Online at EFloras.org. [back]
- "Amaranthus pumilus". in Flora of North America Vol. 4 Page 414, 428, 430. Oxford University Press. Online at EFloras.org. [back]
- Standard Deviation = 15.360 based on 32 observations. Terrestrial altitude and ocean depth information for each observation from British Oceanographic Data Centre. [back]
